ASWU Accountability Report: executives' leadership examined

ASWU Accountability Report:

Each year, the Editorial Board reviews the current school year to highlight areas where ASWU executives and the Assem­bly have succeeded and where they can improve going forward. We look at inter­views with the executives and compare their performance to student expectations and to their own campaign promises dur­ing the elections last spring. Turn to page 6 for a news piece on this topic containing responses from the executive team.

President:

Josh Boyden

Senior Josh Boyden faced a difficult task coming into this year as ASWU president– with relatively little ASWU experience, he was asked not only to lead Whitworth’s student government, but also to help in­troduce the campus to a new university president, represent students on the Uni­versity Council (a board set up by Presi­dent Beck Taylor which has spent much of this year crafting the new 10-year Stra­tegic Plan), and facilitate major unfore­seen campus issues (such as the visit from Westboro Baptist Church last semester).

This board feels that Boyden has han­dled many of these challenges well–Whit­worth has embraced Beck Taylor, the WBC protest was handled smoothly and Boy­den has dedicated many hours to projects benefiting students, such as the trial run of the Daily Digest e-mail system.

Boyden campaigned on two major platforms–addressing the issue of ris­ing tuition and helping the student body through the transition of university lead­ership. As mentioned above, we believe Boyden did an admirable job with the lat­ter; as for the former, Boyden admitted, and this board agrees, that the issue of tuition was handled poorly. While chang­ing Whitworth’s tuition policy is likely outside the scope of the student govern­ment, Boyden should have followed up on his campaign promise by communicating the complexities of the problem to the student body.

Financial Vice President:

Lindy Tep

While the position of FVP is signifi­cantly behind the scenes, senior Lindy Tep has handled well the task of manag­ing ASWU’s large budget and in commu­nicating the details of the budget to ASWU members.

Tep’s position does not allow much room for innovation or new ideas, but it is an office that must be handled compe­tently and consistently - both qualities this board feels that Tep has brought to the job.

While Tep’s responsibilities do not technically encompass communicating with the greater student body, this board does feel that Tep could be involved with communicating financial information to students in a more proactive way. While we admit that many students would not take advantage of such information, it is critical for ASWU to maintain a high stan­dard of accountability and transparency with its constituents in this area.

Executive Vice President:

Shannon Eshoff

Like the FVP, senior Shannon Eshoff’s responsibilities as EVP keep her mostly behind the scenes, working with ASWU members to help them do their jobs better and to hold them accountable. Eshoff’s efforts in this area have been exemplary, maintaining working relationships with a wide variety of constituents.

We believe that Eshoff could take a more active role in managing ASWU meetings (discussed in more detail be­low), but overall, we feel that she has done a solid job as EVP and we encourage her to keep up the good work. She ought to be instrumental in helping the rest of the As­sembly to continue with a strong momen­tum to the end of the year.

ASWU Assembly

To its credit, ASWU has accomplished much of note this school year. The WBC protest was handled smoothly, and com­munication between various administra­tive constituencies has been consistent and done well. Overall, with few excep­tions, members of ASWU have been able to put aside personal feelings and bias in order to put the needs of the student body first. This is easier said than done, and the Assembly ought to be commended.

As a whole, however, the Assembly needs to find ways to conduct meetings in a more professional, orderly manner. As it currently stands, parliamentary protocol is enforced inconsistently, and the execu­tive team (the president, FVP and EVP) appear to have little knowledge of the details of parliamentary protocol beyond basic rules. This has resulted in heated discussions getting out of hand, and some topics taking up far more time than their importance dictates.

This board believes that the solution to this problem starts with the executive team–the president in particular. Cur­rently, the tone of ASWU meetings is very informal and haphazard. Boyden’s lead­ership style is casual and relational, which is a strength in many respects, but it has also lent itself to creating an atmosphere in ASWU meetings that makes it difficult to have consistency in discussions (know­ing what the rules of discussion are, and if they will be enforced). We feel that Boy­den should take on a stronger stance as the leader of the Assembly, setting a tone that encourages cooperation and order.

The Assembly needs to keep in mind that while this year’s budget is large, it likely won’t be from here on out, and that the money ultimately belongs to students. When setting policies that affect the pro­cess of spending money, the Assembly needs to keep in mind that accountability and transparency are the stated goals of ASWU and their responsibility as student leaders.

We encourage the Assembly to con­tinue thinking of creative ways to spend the excess funds to benefit students in the years to come when money likely won’t be as readily available.

Finally, we would encourage all mem­bers of ASWU to finish the year strong. As midterms and eventually finals begin to loom, and the end of the school year gets closer, the temptation to neglect re­sponsibilities is real and understandable, especially amongst the senior members. However, as new students begin to apply for next year’s student leadership posi­tions, it is more important than ever that the Assembly set a good example for its successors, and finish the year strong.

Editorials in the “In the Loop” section reflect the majority opinion of the Editorial Board, which is made up of six editors.

 

Response plan: Assess and address

Issue #13 - March 15, 2011